• The Brothers Karamazov Read-A-Long Post 1

    by  • 07/30/2010 • Brother K Read-A-Long, Classics • 16 Comments

    Info on the insanity and other “suckers” can be found at Fizzy Thoughts

    Why Am I Doing This?

    There are three reasons I signed up for The Brothers Karamazov Read-A-Long–because, believe me, the last thing I feel like doing is reading a long Russian novel all summer long.

    The first reason is that after my father died last year, I decided that one way to maintain a connection with him would be to read some books that were important to him or that he wanted me to read at some point in my life. The Brothers Karamazov was one of those books. In one of letters he wrote to me during college when I was having a really tough time, he quoted this line that he said came from The Brothers Karamazov:

    Know the measure. Know the times. Know yourself.

    The second reason is that when I asked my readers for questions I could answer, one smart-ass (a friend of mine from college) asked: Which Karamazov brother is the hottest? Of course, how could answer this question (and believe you me, I will write an entire post about it once I finish the book) without reading the actual book to find out for myself?

    The third reason is that I’m, admittedly, a lazy modern reader. Because of this, I feel compelled to force myself to read classic books in order to improve my depth as a reader and to continue my self-education. There are so many books (like The Brothers Karamazov) that I hear about but have never read. So, every year, I pick a few classics to read so I can cross them off the list. It is the dietary equivalent of forcing yourself to eat vegetables!

    So, with that in mind, here are my summaries and thoughts on the first three books of The Brothers Karamazov!

    Book 1: A Nice Little Family (<—-sarcasm on Dostoevsky’s part)

    The Story (As Far As I Can Tell): This book introduces us to the three brothers and their father. In this book, we learn that the father of the three brothers (Fyodor) is an Ass with a Capital A. He’s never going to be in the running for father of the year — seeing as he tends to forget about his children (and where his second wife’s grave is) and leaves them to be raised by others. Also, he has major problem with women, manners, and drinking. Yet, despite all his carelessness, he manages to retain his money. His first wife is Dimitri’s mother, and his second wife gave birth to Ivan and Aloysha. Yet none of the brothers were raised together. This is shaping up to be one dysfunctional family.

    My Thoughts:

    • I can tell that names are going to be a problem. Dostoevsky is throwing out facts and history willy-nilly and I’m finding it hard to keep up. I already forgot most of what I learned about Ivan and Dmitri. The only brother who really made an impression on me is Aloysha.
    • Also, who the heck is the narrator of this book? Did I miss something somewhere? I have no idea who is telling this story.
    Book 2: An Inappropriate Gathering

    The Story (As Far As I Can Tell): So the family gathers for a big meeting with a religious elder and Aloysha’s mentor (Father Zosima–a renowned healer and local “celebrity” of sorts) to work out a dispute between Fyodor and Dmitri over an inheritance of some sort … or maybe fishing rights. (To be honest, I’m losing details pretty fast as I wade through the barrage of words that Dostoyesky is vomiting on me.) Dmitri is late for the meeting, so they fill the time by having long involved discussions, with the occasional break for the Elder to go out and bless peasants and visitors and have them tell us about their lives.

    Finally, Dmitri arrives and there is a bit of a dust-up between him and his father over … a woman. (Of course, it would have to be a woman!) Seems like both Dmitri and his father are gunning for the same gal (Grushenka). Meanwhile, Ivan is using Dmitri’s distraction with Grushenka to make a move on Dmitri’s fiancee (Katerina). (Although Dmitri seems fine with this.) Aloyosha seems to be the only one not involved, him being a monk and all. But his mentor, Father Zosima, tells him that he really should leave the monastery and get out in the world.

    My Thoughts:

    • My suspicions that I’m not cut out for this type of book are just being reaffirmed each time I read a chapter. I find myself frequently drifting off while reading. Pages of text go by, and I feel like I’m skimming over a bunch of stuff. Dostoevsky’s writing … um … leaves something to be desired. People start off on rants and just go on and on about a topic that makes my eyes begin to glaze over. The Church vs. the State! Would you be virtuous if there was no immortality? These are some of the issues that crop up out of nowhere and are debated seemingly endlessly, and leave me grasping for a plot. Then, every so often, a character will show up and the plot will kick into high gear and I’ll get some much needed information on what is happening, and then Dostoevsky will go off on some tangent and I’ll start losing the threads of the narrative and start drifting off again. If things don’t change soon, I don’t know how much longer I can stand this.
    • Also, who is Musisov??? He is all over the place during the inappropriate gathering chapter and I kind of forgot who he was or his role in the dispute. Oh well, I’m sure it will either make sense soon enough or it doesn’t matter. All I know is that he doesn’t like Papa Karamazov.
    • I feel like I’m reading and reading and reading and yet I’m only 8% done with the book (according to my Kindle). This is beginning to feel like a torture experiment rather than a read-a-long.
    Book 3: Sensualists

    The Story (As Far As I Can Tell): Finally, the book starts to take on the form of an actual novel, and I’m able to follow along a bit better. First we learn a bit about Fyodor’s servant Grigory and his wife (who I believe were the ones that raised each Karamazov boy before they got farmed out). Turns out, Fyodor has an illegitimate son (Smerdyakov) who was the result of his drunken rape of the village’s idiot girl. Grigory and his wife find the dying mother and adopt and raise Smerdyakov as their own as they recently lost their own child.

    The narrative then picks back up with Aloysha going into town. On the way, he is waylaid by Dmitri, who tells him the history of his engagement to Katerina. It turns out Dmitri intended to deceive Katerina into sleeping with him by lending her money to help bail out her father from a jam. However, at the last moment, he was so ashamed of himself that he ended up giving her the money free and clear. For this, he earns Katerina’s endless thanks and love. So when she comes into money later, he ends up getting engaged to her. (I think … I kind of forgot how they got engaged. )Then he meets Grushenka–who is a very stunning beauty and temptress–and ends up hopelessly enraptured with her and leaves Katerina. He feels shame about it though, and tries to convince Aloysha to break things off with Katerina for him. He also tells Aloysha that their father, Fyodor, has also decided he wants Grushenka and the two are vying for her attentions.

    Aloysha goes on to his father’s house, where his father is drunk (of course) and finishing dinner with Ivan. There are more philosophical debates and then Dmitri bursts through the door–convinced that Grushenka is there. Dmitri attacks Fyodor, but Ivan and Aloysha pull him off before he can kill him. But Dmitri vows he will kill him someday. (Foreshadowing???) Once he leaves, Aloysha nurses Fyodor and then goes to Katerina’s house. Of course, he takes some time to talk with Ivan before he goes.

    At Katerina’s house, Aloysha is shocked to discover Grushenka there. It seems that Grushenka is up to some nasty business of her own–making Katerina (falsely) believe that she will be giving up Dmitri and returning him to Katerina. Grushenka reveals herself to be a bit of a manipulator and not such a good person. Katerina is in tears when Aloysha leaves.

    On his way back to the monastery, Aloysha is again waylaid by Dmitri, who laughs when Aloysha tells him what Grushenka did to Katerina. But filled with self-loathing, Dmitri vows to never see Aloysha again and stumbles off into the night. Aloysha returns to the monastery and, seeing that Father Zosima is on his death bed, vows to stay with him in the monastery. He then reads a letter that has been given to him at some point from one of the girls (Lise) who had been blessed by Father Zosima earlier and who knew Aloysha when they were young. Apparently, she is in love with him and wants to marry him.

    My Thoughts

    • I’m finally starting to get a grip on the story and it is being told in a more conventional way. It seems clear–even to me–that all the brothers represent some aspect of the philosophical debates that I’ve been skimming over in the first parts of the book. Fyodor is the most vile and base person humans can be. Dmitri is a good guy at heart who struggles with his passions so he often does the wrong thing. Ivan seems to be wound up pretty tight and more of an intellectual. Aloysha represents all things good, holy and pure.
    • It also helped when Dostoevsky finally explains the Russian naming system, in which calling someone Aloysha Fyodorovich simply means that they are the son of Fyodor! This was immensely helpful to find out because for the first two books, I was confused if ANYONE was actually named Karamazov.
    • I’m still unclear who the narrator is though. I guess he is some all-knowing and all-seeing narrator and not a real person–although is often interjecting comments and talking as if he is a real person.

    Well, this has been a bit of jumble of a post, but I’ll keep on sticking with it. Here’s to the next three books following a more straightforward narrative path!

    16 Responses to The Brothers Karamazov Read-A-Long Post 1

    1. Serena
      08/03/2010 at 6:10 pm

      You have gotten much further than I ever did. I read 60 pages, understood maybe 2 and gave up.

      I wish you luck finishing this one…and Dostoevsky loves interjecting his own philosophies, etc. into his novels.

    2. Michael5000
      08/02/2010 at 3:56 am

      Smart-ass here.

      OK — to the extent that I worry about your reading choices, which is a very thin extent, I like the idea of you working the classics. The classics are classic because they're classic, and my own experience is that for the more effort I put in, the more value I get out. Reading harder stuff makes it easier to read harder stuff, and get more out of the other stuff. And, of course — probably the real reason — if your reading list is closer to mine, we have more to talk about.

      Having said that, I personally found Karamazov pretty brutal. It is not especially well written, and although some people think it's brilliant, other people find big gaping flaws in it. I tend to run with the second crowd. The good news is, the last quarter or so picks up quite a bit. But, I'm worried that by then you'll be refusing to read anything written before 2004.

      Have fun!

    3. naida
      08/01/2010 at 1:28 pm

      Great post hun!
      And how wonderful that this one reminds you of your dad. I like that one line he quoted to you.
      http://thebookworm07.blogspot.com/

    4. June Freaking Cleaver
      07/31/2010 at 7:46 am

      Are you telling me that you and Mr. Jenners don't debate separation of Church and State and the the difference between being a Christian and being a member of a Christian denomination?

      We talk about that stuff all the time. We debate…I win.

      I kid you not.

      We are thinkers of big thoughts.

      Then we eat cake, or read grocery store ads to see who has the best price on pork.

    5. Kelly
      07/31/2010 at 2:00 am

      I admire you for your efforts! There are many books like this that I feel like I 'should' read, but in reality will never get to.

      I think I'll pass on this one.

    6. softdrink
      07/30/2010 at 11:15 pm

      I'm feeling the same way…confused about the narrator, convinced Dostoevsky is the wordiest Russian ever, and bored by the debates. And I zone out, too…but if I manage to get through the book, I'm still counting the pages skimmed as pages read!

    7. Michele at Reader's Respite
      07/30/2010 at 10:56 pm

      Your reasons for participating in the readalong are far more noble than mine, LOL. But I'm right there with you and feel your pain!

    8. Kathleen
      07/30/2010 at 8:31 pm

      I've always been intimidated by this book for some reason. I look forward to your updates as you read through the novel. And I think it is wonderful that you are doing this project as a result of the book being one of your dad's favorites. That quote your dad sent you in college is WONDERFUL.

    9. Kristen M.
      07/30/2010 at 7:26 pm

      I'm proud of you for picking this one up! I want to do a re-read but want to get a better translation than the two I currently own. Which translation are you reading?

    10. Sandy Nawrot
      07/30/2010 at 4:05 pm

      Ho! I'm impressed, and would claim you to be a better woman than I. The Russian stuff scares me. So maybe you don't want to start Middlesex yet? No worries. Just let me know when you are ready to give it a go, and I'm there!

    11. Alyce
      07/30/2010 at 3:28 pm

      You're doing great with this book so far! I still own my copy, but I remember reading about chapter before tossing it aside and thinking maybe I'll get it read some other day, like if there are no other books for me to read in a fifty mile radius and my car is out of gas. Hopefully some day I'll get a better attitude about it. Which is why I think you're doing so well!

    12. rhapsodyinbooks
      07/30/2010 at 1:44 pm

      I'm with you on the name stuff. It can be very daunting! At this website http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/brothersk/characters.html , for example, each character is listed along with the person's nicknames – I can barely figure out what to fix for dinner each night much lest follow all of that!

    13. Amanda
      07/30/2010 at 1:00 pm

      1. If reading the classics is the equivalent of eating your vegetables, I wish I was as healthy in real life as I am in reading!

      2. Despite saying that, I still think all of you are really brave for attempting this book, which I admit I have no interest in trying at all!

      3. I'd guess your narrator is 3rd person omniscient but periodically dips into 2nd person, as if the author is talking to you. I haven't read the book, but many of the books of that time period were 3rd omniscient and talk to the reader.

      4. Good luck!!!!!

    14. Kaye
      07/30/2010 at 12:47 pm

      Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment was enough reading punishment for me although I do have TBK on my shelf. I don't think I'll be getting to it (if ever) anytime soon. If you want to read Russian lit, go with the master – Leo Tolstoy!!!!!!1

    15. caite
      07/30/2010 at 10:59 am

      ok, my favorite line in a book review this week…or month, maybe year.
      "I'm losing details pretty fast as I wade through the barrage of words that Dostoyesky is vomiting on me."
      lol

    16. Trisha
      07/30/2010 at 5:10 am

      I love the way you did this; although I have to admit that I skimmed a bit since I haven't read it yet and you nuts have me wanting to!

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *